Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 1188 of 2024: Substitute Penalties and Burden of the Defense

Analysis of judgment no. 1188 of 2024 regarding substitute penalties for short custodial sentences and the burden of the defense in the appeal process. Let’s explore how the Court has clarified these crucial aspects.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 4193/2024: Self-Money Laundering and Non-Punishability of the Underlying Offense.

The recent ruling no. 4193 of 2024 clarifies the conditions for the configurability of the crime of self-laundering even in the presence of non-punishability of the underlying offense, emphasizing the importance of the subjective quality of the injured party.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 1810 of 2024: Competition between Fraudulent Withdrawal and Fraudulent Bankruptcy.

An in-depth analysis of ruling no. 1810 of 2024 clarifying the configurability of the concurrence between the crime of fraudulent evasion of tax payments and that of fraudulent bankruptcy, providing important insights for tax criminal law.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 3044 of 2024: Attempted Money Laundering and Configurability of the Crime.

The ruling no. 3044 of 2024 by the Court of Appeal of Bari clarifies the configurability of the attempt of money laundering, emphasizing the distinction between crimes of immediate consummation and crimes of deferred consummation.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 2970 of 2024: The Assignment to the United Sections and Its Implications

Analysis of Judgment No. 2970 of 2024 and its implications regarding Article 610 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with a focus on the legitimacy of the judging panel.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 1061 of 2024: The regime of prosecution upon complaint and the more favorable law.

The recent ruling by the Court of Cassation highlights the importance of the principle of applying the most favorable law in cases of succession of laws in criminal matters, analyzing the transition from the regime of prosecution upon complaint to that of ex officio prosecution.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 2974 of 2025: Execution and Jurisdiction of the Judge

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Rome offers significant insights into the scope of measures that can be adopted by the president of the panel, clarifying the limits and consequences of the delegation of competence.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 47185 of 2024: Withdrawal of the Complaint and Civil Party Constitution.

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 47185 of 2024, which clarifies the connection between the withdrawal of the complaint and the revocation of the civil party's constitution, in light of the changes introduced by Legislative Decree no. 150/2022.

Bianucci Law Firm
Incompatibility of the Judge in Asset Prevention Measures: Commentary on Judgment No. 44504 of 2024

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Florence raises important constitutional legitimacy issues regarding the incompatibility of the judge in the context of asset prevention measures, highlighting the need for a proper application of the norms and fundamental rights.

Bianucci Law Firm
Preventive seizure and confiscation: analysis of Judgment No. 45268 of 2024

The recent ruling no. 45268 of 2024 clarifies the need for adequate reasoning for preventive seizure aimed at confiscation. An in-depth analysis of the legal implications and conditions to be met.