Legal Articles on Preventive Measures

Discover a collection of legal articles focusing on preventive measures in jurisprudence. Stay updated on legal strategies and precautions to navigate legal challenges effectively.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Ordinance No. 1095 of 2024: Prevention Measures and Custody Expenses

Let’s analyze the recent Order No. 1095 of 2024, which clarifies the role of the conversion of the appeal into opposition regarding the custody costs of seized assets.

Bianucci Law Firm
The ruling no. 1251 of 2024 on the confiscation of assets falsely registered to third parties.

A recent ruling clarifies the contestation procedures for third parties in the case of confiscation of fictitiously registered assets. Let’s explore the legal implications and responsibilities in this delicate matter.

Bianucci Law Firm
Incompatibility of the Judge in Asset Prevention Measures: Commentary on Judgment No. 44504 of 2024

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Florence raises important constitutional legitimacy issues regarding the incompatibility of the judge in the context of asset prevention measures, highlighting the need for a proper application of the norms and fundamental rights.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 45642 of 2024: Preventive Measures and Non-retroactivity of Criminal Law.

Let's analyze the ruling no. 45642 of 2024 from the Court of Cassation, which clarifies the applicability of preventive measures and the principle of non-retroactivity of criminal law in the Italian context.

Bianucci Law Firm
Revocation of the confiscation of corporate shares: analysis of ruling no. 45848 of 2024

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation on the right to the restitution of confiscated shares provides important insights into the issue of justice and the protection of property rights.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 45280 of 2024: The Importance of the Presumption of Innocence in the Assessment of Social Dangerousness.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies how an acquittal verdict cannot affect a judgment of social dangerousness, reaffirming the principle of non-contradiction and the value of the presumption of innocence in the Italian legal system.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Sentence No. 46992 of 2024: Seizure and Civil Judgment

Analysis of ruling no. 46992 of 2024 regarding confiscation and the binding nature of civil judgments, with a focus on preventive measures and implications for creditors.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 44259 of 2024: Driving Without a License and Preventive Measures

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the exclusion of criminal liability for those who drive without a license after having complied with preventive measures. Let’s analyze the details and legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 47383 of 2024: Seizure and Opposition in Criminal Law

Let's analyze judgment no. 47383 of 2024, which clarifies important aspects regarding seizure aimed at confiscation and the incompatibility of the judge in the opposition proceedings.

Bianucci Law Firm
Obligation to communicate changes in assets: commentary on Judgment No. 45781 of 2024.

Judgment No. 45781 of 2024 clarifies the obligation to communicate changes in assets even during the suspension of preventive measures, with significant implications for the parties involved.