Discover a collection of legal articles focusing on preventive measures in jurisprudence. Stay updated on legal strategies and precautions to navigate legal challenges effectively.
Let’s analyze the recent Order No. 1095 of 2024, which clarifies the role of the conversion of the appeal into opposition regarding the custody costs of seized assets.
A recent ruling clarifies the contestation procedures for third parties in the case of confiscation of fictitiously registered assets. Let’s explore the legal implications and responsibilities in this delicate matter.
The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Florence raises important constitutional legitimacy issues regarding the incompatibility of the judge in the context of asset prevention measures, highlighting the need for a proper application of the norms and fundamental rights.
Let's analyze the ruling no. 45642 of 2024 from the Court of Cassation, which clarifies the applicability of preventive measures and the principle of non-retroactivity of criminal law in the Italian context.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation on the right to the restitution of confiscated shares provides important insights into the issue of justice and the protection of property rights.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies how an acquittal verdict cannot affect a judgment of social dangerousness, reaffirming the principle of non-contradiction and the value of the presumption of innocence in the Italian legal system.
Analysis of ruling no. 46992 of 2024 regarding confiscation and the binding nature of civil judgments, with a focus on preventive measures and implications for creditors.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the exclusion of criminal liability for those who drive without a license after having complied with preventive measures. Let’s analyze the details and legal implications.
Let's analyze judgment no. 47383 of 2024, which clarifies important aspects regarding seizure aimed at confiscation and the incompatibility of the judge in the opposition proceedings.
Judgment No. 45781 of 2024 clarifies the obligation to communicate changes in assets even during the suspension of preventive measures, with significant implications for the parties involved.