Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 2772 of 2024: The Reasoning in Judgments and the Role of Wiretaps.

Analysis of ruling no. 2772 of 2024, which clarifies the requirements of reasoning in criminal judgments, with particular reference to the use of telephone interceptions. An in-depth look at the principles of clarity and linearity in the reasoning of evidence.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of the Judgment of the Court of Cassation, Criminal Section VI, No. 36432/2024: Embezzlement and Strengthened Motivation.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the reasoning criteria for acquittal in cases of embezzlement, highlighting the need for strengthened reasoning for the appellate judge.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 44959 of 2024: The Role of Motivation in Tax Violations

Analysis of judgment no. 44959 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation concerning the concealment of accounting documentation and the importance of reasoning in criminal proceedings.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 14873 of 2024: Substitute Sanctions and Judge's Motivation

Analysis of ruling no. 14873 of 2024 clarifying the obligation to provide reasoning in determining the daily value of substitute monetary penalties compared to short-term custodial sentences.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 15125 of 2024: Precautionary Measures and Reasoning

Let's analyze the recent ruling of the Court that clarifies the conditions for the applicability of real precautionary measures, with particular reference to the importance of the reasoning regarding 'periculum in mora'.