Welcome to our curated collection of articles and legal cases focusing on seizures in the context of law and jurisprudence. Dive into insightful analysis and court rulings on this important topic.
An analysis of judgment no. 305 of 2024 on the standing of a third party to challenge preventive seizure aimed at confiscation, with references to Italian and European regulations.
Let’s explore ruling no. 1662 of 2024 of the Court of Cassation concerning the procedures for referral to the civil court in the case of preventive seizure and the legal implications for the ownership of the seized assets.
Judgment no. 1663 of 2024 clarifies the procedures for referral to the civil court in case of disputes over the ownership of seized assets. Let’s explore the implications of this decision and its impact on criminal procedural law.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation highlights the importance of reasoning in the evidentiary seizure of electronic data. A detailed analysis of the rights to privacy and the secrecy of correspondence.
The ruling no. 1675 of 2024 by the Court of Assize of Appeal of Rome clarifies the conditions for recognizing mitigating circumstances in the crime of kidnapping for extortion purposes. An in-depth analysis to understand the useful contribution to the truth process.
The ruling no. 3033 of 2024 by the Court of Benevento clarifies the inadmissibility of the appeal against the preventive seizure of assets in the absence of a concrete interest on the part of the accused.
Analysis of the recent ruling no. 4170 of 2024 concerning real precautionary appeals and third-party rights regarding the return of seized assets, with a focus on ownership and availability of the assets.
The recent ruling no. 45268 of 2024 clarifies the need for adequate reasoning for preventive seizure aimed at confiscation. An in-depth analysis of the legal implications and conditions to be met.
Analysis of judgment no. 45644 of 2024 regarding the return of electronic and paper documents in the case of evidentiary seizure, highlighting the legal and practical implications of this decision.
Analysis of ruling no. 46992 of 2024 regarding confiscation and the binding nature of civil judgments, with a focus on preventive measures and implications for creditors.