Understanding Reasoning in Legal Decisions
Legal reasoning is the process by which judges analyze legal principles, apply them to the facts of a case, and make a decision. Stay informed about the importance of reasoning in legal judgments.
Compensation for damage due to loss of family relationship: commentary on Ordinance No. 761 of 2025.
Order No. 761 of 2025 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the motivational criteria for the assessment of damages due to the loss of parental relationship, highlighting the importance of transparency in calculating compensatory amounts.
Analysis of Judgment No. 1270 of 2024: The Rationale of the Judgment and the Powers of the Court of Appeal.
Let's explore the recent ruling no. 1270 of the Court of Appeal of Cagliari, which clarifies the methods of supplementing the reasoning by the appellate judge and the implications for the defendant.
Illegitimacy of Total Seizure of Evidence: Analysis of Judgment No. 1286 of 2024
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation highlights the importance of reasoning in the evidentiary seizure of electronic data. A detailed analysis of the rights to privacy and the secrecy of correspondence.
Analysis of Judgment No. 2355 of 2024: Contradictory Reasons and Decisive Evidence
Let's explore ruling no. 2355 of 2024, analyzing the key aspects related to reasoning and decisive evidence in the context of the appeal to the Supreme Court, with particular reference to Article 603 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Comment on ruling no. 131 of 2024: restorative justice and reasoning in the appeal to the Court of Cassation.
Let's analyze ruling no. 131 of 2024, which clarifies the admissibility of requests for access to restorative justice programs and the limits of the defect in motivation in the appeal to the Court of Cassation.
Judgment No. 2772 of 2024: The Reasoning in Judgments and the Role of Wiretaps.
Analysis of ruling no. 2772 of 2024, which clarifies the requirements of reasoning in criminal judgments, with particular reference to the use of telephone interceptions. An in-depth look at the principles of clarity and linearity in the reasoning of evidence.
Commentary on Judgment No. 3721 of 2025: Renewal of Evidence and Multiple Expert Opinions.
An analysis of ruling no. 3721 of 2025 on the need to consider multiple expert opinions in the case of renewing evidence, highlighting the flaws in reasoning and the legal implications.
Preventive seizure and confiscation: analysis of Judgment No. 45268 of 2024
The recent ruling no. 45268 of 2024 clarifies the need for adequate reasoning for preventive seizure aimed at confiscation. An in-depth analysis of the legal implications and conditions to be met.
Analysis of the Judgment of the Court of Cassation, Civil Section I, No. 5148/2011: Price Review in Public Contracts
The Court of Cassation, with ruling no. 5148 of 2011, addresses the complexity of price revision in public contracts, emphasizing the importance of reasoning in legal decisions and the correct application of ministerial tables.
Analysis of the Judgment of the Court of Cassation, Criminal Section VI, No. 36432/2024: Embezzlement and Strengthened Motivation.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the reasoning criteria for acquittal in cases of embezzlement, highlighting the need for strengthened reasoning for the appellate judge.