Judgment No. 46027 of 2024: Right of Access to Audio Files in Review.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation provides important clarifications on the right to access audio files in the case of complex precautionary measures. Let's analyze the consequences of this decision for the right of defense and the implications for the management of wiretaps.
Commentary on Judgment No. 27509 of 2024: The Importance of Validation in Wiretaps.
Let's analyze ruling no. 27509 of 2024, which clarifies the healing effect of judicial validation in the case of interceptions, highlighting the reasoning and legal implications for evidence.
Wiretapping: Commentary on Judgment No. 26297 of 2024
The ruling no. 26297 of 2024 clarifies the importance of the proper submission of authorization decrees for telephone interceptions, ensuring the right to defense and the legitimacy of precautionary measures.
Analysis of Judgment No. 30040/2024: Wiretaps and Serious Indications.
The recent ruling no. 30040 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the limits of the legitimacy review concerning wiretaps and the assessment of the evidentiary weight. Let’s explore the details and legal implications together.
Analysis of Ruling No. 25939 of 2024: Interpretation of Communicative Facts in the Merits Judgment.
Let’s explore the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the role of the trial judge in the interpretation of communicative facts and the validity of the motivations related to the identification of the individuals involved.
Wiretapping and Admissibility of Evidence: Commentary on Judgment No. 25592 of 2023
The ruling no. 25592 of 2023 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the inadmissibility of evidence obtained through interceptions in the absence of a valid title for the devices. Let’s explore the legal implications of this decision together.
Analysis of Judgment No. 48838 of 2023: Messaging and Interceptions
Let us examine ruling no. 48838 of 2023, which clarifies the applicability of the interception regulations to messaging exchanged via the Sky ECC platform, highlighting the conditions for the acquisition of evidence.
Judgment No. 49959 of 2023: Wiretapping and Inadmissibility of Evidence.
Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 49959 of 2023, which clarifies the inadmissibility of wiretap evidence in the absence of reasoning. An important reference for lawyers and legal scholars.
Commentary on Judgment No. 49627 of 2023: Legitimacy of Concealed Wiretaps.
The recent ruling clarifies the role of the public prosecutor in the transmission of interception orders, highlighting the importance of investigative secrecy and the legitimacy of the partial redaction of information.