Tax Litigation: Analysis of Ordinance No. 694 of 2025

In the context of tax litigation, Ordinance No. 694 of January 10, 2025, issued by the Court of Cassation, has provided significant insights regarding the validity of appeal acts originating from the peripheral office of the Revenue Agency. The ruling addresses the issue of the presumption of representativeness of such acts, a matter of crucial importance for all those facing a dispute with the tax administration.

The Presumption of Validity of Appeal Acts

The principle stated in the ordinance establishes that:

Revenue Agency - Appeal act - Originating from the peripheral office and suitability to express its will - Presumption - Limits. In the context of tax litigation, the origin of an appeal act from the peripheral office of the Revenue Agency and its suitability to represent its will are presumed, even if a corresponding specific delegation is not presented in court, unless the non-belonging of the signatory to the appealing office is contested and proven or, in any case, the usurpation of the power to appeal the judgment.

This provision highlights that, in the absence of contrary evidence, it is presumed that the act actually originates from the competent office and that its author has the authority to appeal. This represents an important safeguard for the Administration, preventing the absence of a specific delegation from invalidating an act that, due to its content, appears legitimate.

Limits of the Presumption

It is essential to note that the presumption of validity is not absolute. In fact, the subject against whom the appeal act is directed has the opportunity to contest this presumption. In particular, they can contest the non-belonging of the signatory to the office that issued the act or demonstrate that the power to appeal the judgment has been usurped. These aspects are crucial to ensure the right to defense and to prevent abuses in the exercise of public power.

  • Origin of the act from the peripheral office
  • Suitability to represent the will of the Office
  • Possibility of contestation and limits of the presumption

Conclusions

In conclusion, Ordinance No. 694 of 2025 represents an important step forward in the clarity of the rules concerning tax litigation. It emphasizes the importance of a presumption of validity of appeal acts, while at the same time imposing necessary limits to ensure the protection of taxpayers' rights. The ability to contest the act in case of illegitimacy is fundamental to maintain a balance between the efficiency of the Administration and the respect for citizens' rights. Staying informed about such legal issues is essential for anyone managing tax litigation.

Bianucci Law Firm