The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the criteria for assessing catastrophic damages, highlighting the importance of personalizing compensation in cases of psychological suffering related to traumatic events.
An analysis of judgment no. 515 of 2020 of the Court of Cassation regarding the causal link between the refusal of a transfusion and the road accident. The issues of liability and the right to self-determination are discussed.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the boundaries between biological damage and moral damage, highlighting the importance of allegations in the compensation for non-economic damages.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation no. 16592 of 2019 provides important guidelines on the assessment of catastrophic damage and the fairness of the economic evaluation by judges, emphasizing the need to consider psychological suffering in cases of imminent death.