Analysis of Judgment No. 2157 of 2025: Dismissal for Just Cause and Law 104 Leave

The recent judgment no. 2157 of January 30, 2025, issued by the Court of Cassation, has raised important questions regarding the use of leave provided by Law 104 of 1992, particularly those related to the assistance of disabled family members. This article will explore the key points of the ruling, analyzing the implications for workers and employers.

The Regulatory Context

Law 104 of 1992 is fundamental in Italy, as it recognizes and protects the rights of people with disabilities and their family members. In particular, Article 33 provides paid leave for workers who assist a disabled family member. However, judgment no. 2157 clarifies that the use of this leave must be strictly related to the assistance of the disabled family member.

The Ruling of the Judgment

Generally. The use of the leave provided for in Article 33 of Law No. 104 of 1992 for activities other than assisting the disabled family member, such as to violate the purposes for which the benefit is granted and to undermine the causal link between absence from work and assistance to the person with a disability, is behavior suitable to justify dismissal for just cause and verifiable by the employer also through investigative agencies, which can be entrusted with the task of verifying fraudulent conduct by the worker or conduct that may constitute a crime. (In applying the principle, the Court of Cassation stated that the employer legitimately used an investigative agency to verify the fraudulent use of leave, in this case systematically used by the employee for sports activities).

This ruling emphasizes the necessity of appropriate use of the leave. Abusing such leave by using it for purposes unrelated to assistance can justify dismissal for just cause. The Court also established that employers can use investigative agencies to verify the correct use of such leave, an aspect that may raise ethical and legal issues.

Implications for Workers and Employers

The consequences of this ruling are significant:

  • For workers, it is essential to use the leave exclusively for purposes related to the assistance of the disabled family member, in order to avoid severe penalties such as dismissal.
  • Employers must be aware of their rights in monitoring the use of the leave, but they must also act cautiously to avoid abuses by investigative agencies.
  • It is important that both parties are informed about the rights and duties provided by current regulations and the rulings of the Court.

Conclusions

Judgment no. 2157 of 2025 represents an important legal precedent regarding leave for assistance to disabled family members. It reiterates the necessity for correct and transparent use of such leave and clarifies the legal consequences in cases of abuse. It is essential that both workers and employers understand the implications of this ruling to ensure a respectful and legally compliant work environment.

Bianucci Law Firm