Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 2974 of 2025: Execution and Jurisdiction of the Judge

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Rome offers significant insights into the scope of measures that can be adopted by the president of the panel, clarifying the limits and consequences of the delegation of competence.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 45840 of 24/10/2024: Embezzlement and Delegated Professionals in Executive Procedures.

The ruling no. 45840 of 2024 clarifies the configurability of the crime of embezzlement in the case of appropriation of the sums paid by the successful bidders by delegated professionals in real estate foreclosures.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 25943 of 2024: The Enforcement Incident and the Validity of the Absentee Decree.

An analysis of ruling no. 25943 of 2024 that clarifies the conditions for challenging the validity of the decree of fugitive status in an enforcement incident, highlighting the importance of proper notification and the formation of the executive title.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 27151 of 2024: Legitimacy of the Civil Party in the Execution Incident.

Let’s analyze the recent ruling of the Court that clarifies the role of the injured party in the execution process and their standing to participate in case of failure to fulfill compensation obligations.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Order No. 18152 of 2024: Collection of Sanctions and Prescription of Credit.

Let's analyze the important Order No. 18152 of 2024, which clarifies the possibility of raising the statute of limitations on claims in opposition to enforcement for traffic fines, providing insights into the protection of citizens' rights.

Bianucci Law Firm
Reform of the Quantum Debeatur: Judgment No. 16664 of 2024 and the Implications on Forced Execution.

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Venice clarifies the consequences of the modification of the quantum debeatur on the enforcement procedure, distinguishing between an increase and a decrease of the enforceable title. Learn more in our in-depth analysis.

Bianucci Law Firm
Supreme Court 16535 of 2024: The Qualification of the Action and Its Consequences

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the importance of the qualification of claims in civil matters, establishing binding judgments and time limitations for appeals.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 16006 of 2024: Forced Collection and Third-Party Opposition

Let’s analyze the recent ruling no. 16006 of 2024, which clarifies the evidentiary procedures in third-party opposition against mobiliary execution in the context of enforced collection. A focus on evidentiary limitations and the required documents.

Bianucci Law Firm
Ordinary Jurisdiction in Forced Execution: Analysis of Judgment No. 18635 of 2024

Order No. 18635 of 2024 clarifies the ordinary jurisdiction in opposition to enforcement actions arising from judgments of the Court of Auditors, highlighting the separation between public liability and subjective right.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 25556 of 2023: Enforcement Incidents and Executory Titles

Let's analyze ruling no. 25556 of 2023, which clarifies the distinctions between execution incident and restitution within the term, highlighting the importance of proper notification to the convicted person.