Analysis of Judgment No. 45840 of 24/10/2024: Embezzlement and Delegated Professionals in Executive Procedures

The recent judgment No. 45840 of October 24, 2024, by the Court of Cassation has sparked an important debate on the responsibility of delegated professionals in the field of real estate executive procedures. In particular, the Court confirmed that the conduct of a professional who appropriates the sums paid by the successful bidders constitutes the crime of embezzlement. This issue is crucial not only for professionals in the sector but also for citizens who may find themselves involved in such procedures.

The Context of the Judgment

The case involved a professional, V. D. F., appointed by the judge to manage the sales operations within a real estate executive procedure. According to the Court, the professional had factual control over the sums paid by the successful bidders into a deposit account held in the name of the procedure, which establishes his criminal liability. This aspect is of fundamental importance, as it highlights how the trust placed in delegated professionals must be protected by strict legal responsibility.

Real estate executive procedure - Professional delegated for sales operations - Appropriation of sums paid by successful bidders - Configurability of the crime - Existence. The conduct of the professional appointed by the judge to manage the sales operations within the real estate execution procedure, who appropriates the sums paid by the successful bidders into a deposit account held in the name of the procedure, of which he had factual availability by virtue of the office held, integrates the crime of embezzlement.

Legal and Regulatory Implications

The judgment is based on previous case law and norms of the Penal Code, particularly Article 314, which governs embezzlement. The Court clarified that the professional's conduct cannot be justified by his position as a delegate, since public trust and the integrity of executive procedures must always be guaranteed. This principle aligns with European regulations that protect transparency and accountability in the management of funds by public officials.

  • Responsibility of the delegated professional.
  • Protection of successful bidders in executive procedures.
  • Regarding the availability of sums and their appropriation.

Conclusions

Judgment No. 45840 of 2024 represents an important step forward in the fight against corruption and abuse of power in executive procedures. It emphasizes the need for rigorous and transparent management of the sums paid by successful bidders and strengthens the responsibility of delegated professionals. It is essential for citizens to be aware of these legal developments to protect their rights and interests in executive procedures.

Bianucci Law Firm