Preventive Seizure in Jurisprudence

Discover comprehensive articles and analyses on preventive seizure in jurisprudence. Stay up-to-date with the latest court decisions and legal perspectives.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 305 of 2024: Preventive Seizure and Standing of the Third Party.

An analysis of judgment no. 305 of 2024 on the standing of a third party to challenge preventive seizure aimed at confiscation, with references to Italian and European regulations.

Bianucci Law Firm
Fraudulent Bankruptcy: Commentary on Judgment No. 3033 of 2024

The ruling no. 3033 of 2024 by the Court of Benevento clarifies the inadmissibility of the appeal against the preventive seizure of assets in the absence of a concrete interest on the part of the accused.

Bianucci Law Firm
Preventive seizure and confiscation: analysis of Judgment No. 45268 of 2024

The recent ruling no. 45268 of 2024 clarifies the need for adequate reasoning for preventive seizure aimed at confiscation. An in-depth analysis of the legal implications and conditions to be met.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of the Judgment Cass. pen., Sec. II, no. 16369 of 2024: Seizure of Assets and Self-Laundering.

The ruling of the Supreme Court of Cassation in 2024 provides important insights into the limits and peculiarities of the crime of self-laundering, highlighting the conditions for the seizure of assets and judicial interpretations.

Bianucci Law Firm
Seizure of assets in criminal matters: Analysis of the ruling Cass. pen. no. 36053 of 2024

An in-depth analysis of the recent ruling by the Court of Cassation regarding preventive seizure in cases of fraudulent bankruptcy, with particular attention to the distinction between lawful and unlawful proceeds.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of the Judgment Cass. Pen., Section II, No. 47331 of 2023: Seizure and Statute of Limitations in Fraud.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the position regarding preventive seizure in the event of the statute of limitations for the crime of fraud, examining the relationship with self-laundering and the legal implications for seized assets.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 28502 of 2024: Preventive Seizure and Derogatory Tax Regime

Let us analyze the ruling no. 28502 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation, focused on the reviewability of preventive seizure orders and the assessment of the prerequisites for access to favorable tax regimes.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 14047 of 2024: Preventive Seizure and Liability of Entities

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 14047 of 2024, highlighting the importance of the motivation of 'periculum' in preventive seizure according to Legislative Decree no. 231/2001. An in-depth examination to understand the legal implications for legal entities.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 15673 of 2024: The Role of the Third Party in Preventive Seizure.

Judgment No. 15673 of 2024 provides important insights on the right of a third-party titleholder to contest a preventive seizure, clarifying the necessary conditions for the validity of confiscation and the role of the fictitious nature of the title.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 15637 of 2024: Preventive Seizure and the Principle of Proportionality

Let's analyze ruling no. 15637 of 2024, which clarifies the conditions for the applicability of preventive seizure and the role of the principle of proportionality in the execution phase.