An analysis of judgment no. 305 of 2024 on the standing of a third party to challenge preventive seizure aimed at confiscation, with references to Italian and European regulations.
The recent ruling no. 45268 of 2024 clarifies the need for adequate reasoning for preventive seizure aimed at confiscation. An in-depth analysis of the legal implications and conditions to be met.
Let's analyze the recent ruling of the Court that clarifies the conditions for the applicability of real precautionary measures, with particular reference to the importance of the reasoning regarding 'periculum in mora'.