• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
Bianucci Law Firm
Preventive seizure and confiscation: analysis of Judgment No. 45268 of 2024

The recent ruling no. 45268 of 2024 clarifies the need for adequate reasoning for preventive seizure aimed at confiscation. An in-depth analysis of the legal implications and conditions to be met.

Read More

Latest Articles
Commentary on Judgment No. 47185 of 2024: Withdrawal of the Complaint and Civil Party Constitution.
March 1, 2025
Incompatibility of the Judge in Asset Prevention Measures: Commentary on Judgment No. 44504 of 2024
March 1, 2025
Preventive seizure and confiscation: analysis of Judgment No. 45268 of 2024
March 1, 2025
Commentary on Judgment No. 44357 of 2024: Corruption and Gifts of Modest Value
March 1, 2025
Commentary on Judgment No. 45642 of 2024: Preventive Measures and Non-retroactivity of Criminal Law.
March 1, 2025
Commentary on Judgment No. 45262 of 2024: Referral and Legal Qualification
March 1, 2025
Couriers and Criminal Conspiracy: Commentary on Judgment No. 44359 of 2024.
March 1, 2025
Commentary on Judgment No. 47563 of 2024: Association for the Illicit Trafficking of Narcotic Substances
March 1, 2025
Commentary on Judgment No. 47271 of 2024: Rescission of the Res Judicata and Knowledge of the Process.
March 1, 2025
Commentary on Judgment No. 44064 of 2024: Qualification of Organizer in Criminal Association.
March 1, 2025

Sections

Categories

Tags