Legal Precautionary Measures: Articles, Cases & Insights

Discover a collection of legal articles, cases, and insights focused on precautionary measures in the legal landscape. Stay updated with the latest resources and information.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 305 of 2024: Preventive Seizure and Standing of the Third Party.

An analysis of judgment no. 305 of 2024 on the standing of a third party to challenge preventive seizure aimed at confiscation, with references to Italian and European regulations.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 604 of 2024: Precautionary Measures and Registration in the Criminal Record.

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 604 of 2024, which clarifies the legitimacy of precautionary measures even in the absence of registration in the criminal record, highlighting the legal and practical implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 614 of 2024: Extradition and Precautionary Measures

Analysis of the recent ruling by the Court of Appeal of Rome regarding precautionary measures in the context of extradition, focusing on the legitimacy of the suspension of coercive measures for internal justice needs.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 1919 of 2024: Appeal and Obligation of Specific Statement of Reasons.

Ruling no. 1919 of 2024 clarifies the importance of specificity in the grounds for appeal, highlighting how the lack of details can compromise the right to defense and the judge's assessment.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 4170 of 2024: Precautionary Appeals and Return of Seized Assets

Analysis of the recent ruling no. 4170 of 2024 concerning real precautionary appeals and third-party rights regarding the return of seized assets, with a focus on ownership and availability of the assets.

Bianucci Law Firm
Preventive seizure and confiscation: analysis of Judgment No. 45268 of 2024

The recent ruling no. 45268 of 2024 clarifies the need for adequate reasoning for preventive seizure aimed at confiscation. An in-depth analysis of the legal implications and conditions to be met.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 47593 of 15/10/2024: Precautionary Measures and Evaluation of Defense Elements.

Analysis of the recent ruling on the assessment of evidence in the granting of personal precautionary measures, with a focus on the alleged failure to consider defensive elements.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 47388 of 2024: Jurisdiction in Preventive Seizure Matters

Analysis of ruling no. 47388 of 2024 regarding the competence of the president of the court on the opposition to the liquidation decree proposed by the judicial administrator in the context of preventive seizure.

Bianucci Law Firm
Protective Measures and Appeals: Commentary on Judgment No. 44060 of 2024

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 44060 of 2024 regarding personal precautionary measures and the methods of appeal, clarifying the conditions for the request for review and the differences between original precautionary measures and autonomous ones.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on the Judgment of the Italian Supreme Court, Criminal Section II, No. 21981 of 2024: Precautionary Measures and Participation in Mafia Associations.

The analysis of ruling no. 21981 of 2024 provides important insights into the definition of participation in a mafia association and the application of personal precautionary measures, highlighting the importance of legal reasoning and evidence of guilt.