Discover a collection of legal articles, cases, and insights focused on precautionary measures in the legal landscape. Stay updated with the latest resources and information.
An analysis of judgment no. 305 of 2024 on the standing of a third party to challenge preventive seizure aimed at confiscation, with references to Italian and European regulations.
Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 604 of 2024, which clarifies the legitimacy of precautionary measures even in the absence of registration in the criminal record, highlighting the legal and practical implications.
Analysis of the recent ruling by the Court of Appeal of Rome regarding precautionary measures in the context of extradition, focusing on the legitimacy of the suspension of coercive measures for internal justice needs.
Ruling no. 1919 of 2024 clarifies the importance of specificity in the grounds for appeal, highlighting how the lack of details can compromise the right to defense and the judge's assessment.
Analysis of the recent ruling no. 4170 of 2024 concerning real precautionary appeals and third-party rights regarding the return of seized assets, with a focus on ownership and availability of the assets.
The recent ruling no. 45268 of 2024 clarifies the need for adequate reasoning for preventive seizure aimed at confiscation. An in-depth analysis of the legal implications and conditions to be met.
Analysis of the recent ruling on the assessment of evidence in the granting of personal precautionary measures, with a focus on the alleged failure to consider defensive elements.
Analysis of ruling no. 47388 of 2024 regarding the competence of the president of the court on the opposition to the liquidation decree proposed by the judicial administrator in the context of preventive seizure.
Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 44060 of 2024 regarding personal precautionary measures and the methods of appeal, clarifying the conditions for the request for review and the differences between original precautionary measures and autonomous ones.
The analysis of ruling no. 21981 of 2024 provides important insights into the definition of participation in a mafia association and the application of personal precautionary measures, highlighting the importance of legal reasoning and evidence of guilt.