• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Commentary on the Judgment of the Court of Cassation, Criminal Section II, No. 21981 of 2024: Precautionary Measures and Participation in Mafia Associations

The recent ruling by the Court of Cassation, Criminal Section II, No. 21981 of 2024, offers an interesting reflection on participation in a mafia-type association and the necessary conditions for the application of personal precautionary measures. The case concerns A.A., accused of being part of a mafia association and having played operational roles within it. The Court upheld the decisions of the Lecce Tribunal, rejecting the appeal filed by the defendant.

The Legal Context and Grounds for Appeal

The appellant contested the erroneous application of criminal law, arguing that his role as a custodian of sums of money had been misinterpreted. According to A.A., the money held could not be considered part of the "common fund" of the association, but rather a personal sum linked to B.B. In particular, the appellant highlighted that the amounts managed were minimal and used for personal purposes.

Participation in a mafia association implies a stable and conscious insertion into the group, which goes beyond mere proximity.

The Court's Assessments

The Court reiterated that for the adoption of precautionary measures, it is sufficient to have a circumstantial framework demonstrating "serious indications of guilt." In this case, the Court examined several incriminating elements, including:

  • A.A.'s knowledge of the intimidation actions planned by the association.
  • His contribution to carrying out acts of intimidation and retaliation.
  • The provision of weapons to B.B. and the willingness to clear B.B.'s house from any potential checks.
  • Support for prisoners through the delivery of clothing.

The Court deemed that the sum of these elements highlighted a stable insertion of the defendant in the association, thus confirming the legitimacy of the precautionary measure. A.A. could not be considered an outsider to the group's dynamics, but rather a conscious and active participant.

Conclusion

Judgment No. 21981 of 2024 provides an important interpretation of participation in a mafia association and the associated precautionary measures. It emphasizes the need for a comprehensive assessment of the indications of guilt and the distinction between mere proximity and active participation in the criminal context. The decision of the Court of Cassation fits into a legal framework aimed at strengthening the fight against mafia associations, establishing strict criteria for the application of precautionary measures.