Let’s analyze the recent order no. 21397 of July 30, 2024, which clarifies the limits of application of administrative sanctions in the context of financial intermediation, highlighting the importance of substantive law and its impact on violations that occurred prior to the entry into force of the new provisions.
Analysis of ruling no. 19716 of 2024 regarding the opposition to the extent of administrative sanctions in the context of the TUB and TUF, highlighting the discretionary powers of the judge and the conditions for review.
Let's analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Rome that clarifies the moment of filing for the appeal in the opposition procedure against the administrative injunction order, providing useful guidelines for lawyers and industry professionals.
Order No. 19892 of 2024 provides important clarifications on off-budget municipal expenses and the role of administrators, highlighting the prerequisites for the emergence of mandatory relationships between private individuals and local authorities.
Let's analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation no. 17326 of 2024, which clarifies important aspects regarding the adjustment obligation in agreements for public housing, distinguishing the responsibilities between public entities and beneficiaries.
Let's analyze ruling no. 19253 of 2024, which clarifies the boundaries of judicial review on technical evaluations in public competitions, highlighting the limits set by Italian case law.
Judgment No. 19299 of July 12, 2024 provides important clarifications on jurisdiction in European school disputes, establishing the role of the Appeals Chamber under the Luxembourg Convention.
Let's analyze Ordinance No. 18653 of 2024, which clarifies the jurisdiction in public employment matters, with a focus on competition procedures and the allocation of competencies between ordinary and administrative judges.
The recent ruling no. 18623 of 2024 clarifies the legitimacy of direct assignments to in-house companies for integrated water services, excluding violations of the principle of competition. A thorough analysis of the legal implications.
The recent ruling of the Supreme Court provides important clarifications on the distinction between the concession fee and the additional tariff component for mineral waters, highlighting the importance of a correct interpretation of local regulations.