Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 2776 of 2024: Cartabia Reform and Electricity Theft

Analysis of ruling no. 2776 of 2024, which clarifies the prosecutability of electricity theft in light of the Cartabia reform. It highlights the limits and the possibilities of contestation by the public prosecutor.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on ruling no. 45829 of 2024: substitute penalties and the competence of the judge of referral.

Analysis of ruling no. 45829 of 2024 regarding the application of substitute penalties in the event of annulment with referral. An in-depth look at the transitional provisions introduced by the Cartabia Reform.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 45857 of 2024: Reform of the Role in Drug Trafficking and Prohibition of Reformatio in Peius.

Let’s explore the ruling of the Court of Cassation no. 45857 of 2024, which clarifies the limits of the referral judgment and the respect for the prohibition of reformatio in peius in cases of disputes related to drug trafficking.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 44000 of 2024: The Importance of the Prohibition of 'Reformatio in Peius' in Criminal Appeal.

Let's analyze the ruling no. 44000 of October 15, 2024, which clarifies the prohibition of 'reformatio in peius' and its application in the appellate process, with particular reference to the reduction of the sentence.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of the Judgment of the Supreme Court, United Sections, No. 12228/2014: Extortion and Undue Inducement.

The ruling of the Court of Cassation in 2014 provides an important reflection on the crimes of extortion and undue influence, outlining the differences between the two offenses and the regulatory implications of the 2012 reform.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 30625 of 2024: Prohibition of Reformatio in Peius

The ruling no. 30625 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the prohibition of reformatio in peius in criminal matters, highlighting the importance of mitigating circumstances and their implications on the imposed sentence.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 27181 of 2024: Prosecution upon Complaint and Non-Prosecution in Criminal Law.

The recent ruling no. 27181 of 2024 clarifies the limits of the prosecution upon complaint and the obligation to declare inadmissibility in the absence of a complaint, highlighting important aspects related to abuse of process and the Cartabia reform.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 26294 of 2024: Prescription and Orlando Reform

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 26294 of 2024, which clarifies the applicability of the statute of limitations for offenses committed between August 3, 2017, and December 31, 2019, highlighting the differences with subsequent reforms.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 28474 of 2024: Suspension of the Statute of Limitations and Orlando Reform.

Judgment No. 28474 of 2024 provides important clarifications on the suspension of the statute of limitations for crimes committed between August 3, 2017, and December 31, 2019, highlighting the applicability of the Orlando reform. Let's explore the details and legal implications together.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 26575 of 2024: Constitution of Civil Party and Complaint.

Judgment No. 26575 of 2024 clarifies the equivalence between the non-revoked civil party constitution and the complaint, in light of the 'Cartabia' reform. Let us explore the meaning and implications of this decision.