The recent ruling no. 17604 of 2023 addresses the issue of the seizure of electronic devices, analyzing the need to limit the duration of the constraint in relation to technical difficulties and the cooperation of the defendant.
Judgment No. 15636 of 2023 clarifies that the opposition to the order rejecting the request for revocation in matters of confiscation must respect the adversarial principle, under penalty of nullity of the provision. An analysis of the legal and practical implications of this ruling.
Analysis of the recent ruling No. 39680 of 2024, which clarifies the methods of verifying third-party claims in relation to preventive seizures, in light of legislative changes and the principle of good faith.
Ruling No. 36776 of 2024 clarifies the parameters for the duration of the seizure of digital devices, emphasizing the importance of proportionality and access to data. Let's explore the legal implications of this provision together.
The ruling no. 38890 of 2024 clarifies the requirements for the execution of preventive seizure against an entity, analyzing the necessity of appointing a public defender and the notice of guarantee.
The recent ruling no. 37409 of 2024 analyzes the methods of evidence seizure of electronic devices, the return of forensic copies, and the protection of personal data. Let's explore the legal and practical implications of this decision together.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation provides important insights on the liability of companies in cases of administrative offenses, with particular attention to the seizure of assets.
Analysis of ruling no. 32274 of the Court of Cassation regarding preventive seizure and tax fraud, with particular attention to the implications of transferring sums abroad.