Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 45413 of 2024: the Preclusive Effect of the Measures of the Enforcement Judge.

Judgment no. 45413 of 2024 provides important insights regarding the preclusive effect of the measures taken by the enforcement judge, clarifying the limits and conditions for a new decision on the same subject.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 44020/2024: Suspension of the Order for the Enforcement of Short Custodial Sentences.

Analysis of ruling no. 44020 of 2024 on the computation of short prison sentences and the related deductions, clarifying the legal implications and the associated regulations.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Order No. 19777 of 17/07/2024: Clarifications on the Commencement of Terms in Forced Execution.

Order no. 19777 of July 17, 2024 provides important clarifications on the commencement of deadlines for executive opposition, highlighting the role of the judge and the methods of communication of documents.

Bianucci Law Firm
The ruling no. 19123 of 2024: Forced execution and impossibility of performance.

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 19123 of 2024, which clarifies the limits of forced execution in the event of loss of availability of the movable property subject to condemnation. An important decision for creditors and debtors.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 19015 of 2024: Forced Execution and Legal Interests

Judgment No. 19015 of 2024 clarifies the limitations of the creditor in forced execution for legal interests, highlighting the relevant regulatory and jurisprudential boundaries.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on the Order Judgment No. 18367 of 2024: Opposition to Execution and Autonomy of Grounds.

Analysis of the recent Order No. 18367 of 04/07/2024, which clarifies the autonomy of the grounds in opposition to enforcement and the implications for legal fees. Let’s explore the fundamental principles of this decision together.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 17055 of 20/06/2024: Forced Execution and Abuse of Clauses.

Judgment No. 17055 of 2024 addresses the issue of enforcement based on an unchallenged injunction, highlighting the importance of official verification of abusive clauses in contractual matters, in accordance with Directive 93/13/EEC.

Bianucci Law Firm
Order No. 16576 of 2024: Enforcement and Destination Constraints of Funds

We explore the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the information burden of third parties in the event of the seizure of sums intended for local authorities, highlighting the responsibilities and constraints related to the treasury.

Bianucci Law Firm
Order No. 16027 of 2024: Registration Fees and Recovery in Third-Party Foreclosure.

An in-depth analysis of order no. 16027 of 2024, which clarifies responsibilities regarding registration fees in the context of third-party seizures. Discover how the Court rules on legal fees and the parties responsible for payment.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 15678 of 2024: Ineffectiveness of Rental Management Acts in Enforcement Proceedings.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the ineffectiveness of the acts of managing the lease contract carried out by the debtor during an enforcement procedure, highlighting the consequences for landlords and tenants.