Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 575 of 2025: Territorial Jurisdiction and Responsibility of Judges

The recent Order No. 575 of 2025 clarifies the rules of territorial jurisdiction in cases of civil liability of magistrates, highlighting the distinction between intentional and negligent behaviors, and the related legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 525 of 2025: The Power of the Judge and Civil Evidence

Analysis of the recent ruling by the Court of Cassation regarding the judge's power to request information from the public administration, focusing on liability for damages from blood transfusions.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 1653 of 2025: The Principle of 'Favor Rei' in the Disciplinary Responsibility of Judges.

Let’s explore the recent ruling no. 1653 of 2025, which clarifies the applicability of the principle of 'favor rei' in disciplinary matters for judges, highlighting its implications and limits.

Bianucci Law Firm
Functional jurisdiction and waiver of perpetuatio iurisdictionis: analysis of ruling no. 44814 of 2024.

The ruling of the Court of Cassation No. 44814 of 2024 addresses the issue of jurisdiction in proceedings concerning magistrates, highlighting the exception to the principle of perpetuatio iurisdictionis and the importance of the emerging situation during the trial.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 26805 of 2024: Nullity and Jurisdiction of Honorary Justices of the Peace in the Court of Review.

Analysis of ruling no. 26805 of 2024 on the nullity of orders issued by honorary justices of the peace in the context of the review court, highlighting the legal and regulatory implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 27727 of 2023: Lay Judges and Age Limits in Criminal Proceedings

We analyze ruling no. 27727 of 2023, which clarifies the implications of surpassing the age of sixty-five by lay judges and their jurisdictional capacity during the trial.