Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 575 of 2025: Territorial Jurisdiction and Responsibility of Judges

The recent Order No. 575 of 2025 clarifies the rules of territorial jurisdiction in cases of civil liability of magistrates, highlighting the distinction between intentional and negligent behaviors, and the related legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of the Judgment of the Court of Cassation, Criminal Section VI, No. 14782/2020: Extortion and Statute of Limitations.

The Court of Cassation rules on the legal qualification of the crime of extortion, highlighting the distinction with incitement to corruption and the issue of statute of limitations.

Bianucci Law Firm
Protection of minors: commentary on the ruling of the Court of Cassation, Section I, no. 17603/2023

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation no. 17603/2023 provides important clarifications on the appointment of guardians for unaccompanied foreign minors, with particular reference to the situation of Ukrainian minors in Italy.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of the Judgment of the Court of Cassation, Criminal Section V, No. 37159 of 2024: Fraudulent Bankruptcy and Liability of Directors.

The very recent ruling of the Supreme Court of Cassation provides important clarifications on the criminal liability of directors in cases of fraudulent bankruptcy, highlighting critical aspects regarding the motivation and the subjective element of the crime.

Bianucci Law Firm
Order No. 19711 of 2024: The Validity of Urban Planning Certification in Land Sales.

The ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the conditions for the integration of urban planning certification in the case of the sale of land that has become non-buildable. Discover how this ruling affects real estate transactions.

Bianucci Law Firm
Order No. 10139 of 2024: Clarifications on the Suspension of Procedural Deadlines During the Covid-19 Emergency.

The ruling of the Court of Cassation provides important clarifications on the start of procedural deadlines in relation to the suspension imposed due to the epidemiological emergency, ensuring the defendant's right to defense.