The ruling of the Supreme Court clarifies the prerequisites for civil liability in the event of harm from unwanted birth, delving into the role of medical information and the burden of proof.
The ordinance of the Court of Cassation clarifies the absence of obligation for the Ministry of Health to accept settlement proposals in cases of transfusion damage, highlighting the need for specific forms and procedures.
Let's examine judgment no. 44361 of 2024, which highlights the nullity of the non-participated chamber judgment when the presence of the defense counsel is not guaranteed, in a context of pandemic emergency.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation of October 3, 2023 provides important clarifications on the start of the statute of limitations for damages from blood transfusions, emphasizing the need for a correct identification of the dies a quo and the importance of the awareness of the damage.
The 2022 ruling of the Court of Cassation provides important clarifications on the legitimacy of claims-made clauses in insurance contracts. Let’s explore the key aspects and implications for the parties involved.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation in 2004 provides important insights into the liability of hospital entities for diagnostic errors and the burden of proof in cases of medical malpractice.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation provides significant insights into compulsory health treatment and the responsibility of doctors, clarifying patients' rights and the methods of challenging health care decisions.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation in 2019 clarifies the principles of medical liability and the assessment of damages in cases of malpractice. An in-depth analysis of the legal aspects and implications for patients' rights.
Let's analyze the ruling of the Court of Cassation that addressed the issue of medical liability and loss of chance, highlighting the relevant legal principles and the implications for patients' rights.
An analysis of the Supreme Court ruling regarding the statute of limitations and the liability of the Ministry of Health in cases of damage from contaminated blood. The Court reiterates the terms of the statute of limitations and the extracontractual nature of liability.