Welcome to our page dedicated to malpractice, where you can find valuable insights from legal experts, in-depth articles, and real-life case studies on this important topic in the field of law.
Let's analyze the case of M.V., an endoscopic surgeon, convicted of professional negligence following a surgery that led to the death of a ninety-year-old patient, and the legal implications related to medical liability.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation in 2019 clarifies the principles of medical liability and the assessment of damages in cases of malpractice. An in-depth analysis of the legal aspects and implications for patients' rights.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation addresses the issue of medical liability in cases of diagnostic errors, highlighting the consequences on biological damage and the loss of chances of life. An in-depth analysis of the legal implications and substantive assessments.
A detailed analysis of the recent order no. 16737 of 2024, which clarifies the evidential value of the statements contained in a medical record and the importance of documentary evidence in the healthcare sector.
Order no. 10901 of 2024 of the Court of Cassation provides significant insights on the issue of the alteration of the claim in medical malpractice compensation proceedings, clarifying that the constitutive fact must be considered in its material essence.
Analysis of the ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the principles of liability in cases of medical malpractice, highlighting the importance of the distinction between biological damage and pre-existing disability.
The ruling of the Court of Catanzaro addresses the clinic's liability for the death of a patient, clarifying the rights of the relative regarding compensation for damages. The legal implications and medical evidence that led to the decision are analyzed.
Let’s analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation regarding the liability of the ASL for infections contracted in hospitals. An emblematic case that raises important questions about the right to health and the burden of proof.