The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation analyzes the distinction between biological damage and moral damage, highlighting the importance of avoiding compensation duplications and providing rigorous evidence in cases of psychological injuries.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation addresses the issue of the assessment of personal and moral damages in the event of post-operative complications, highlighting the importance of a comprehensive evaluation of the harm suffered by the victim.
Analysis of the ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the principles of liability in cases of medical malpractice, highlighting the importance of the distinction between biological damage and pre-existing disability.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation no. 6503 of 2022 addresses the issue of compensation for biological damage in the case of workplace injury, clarifying the limits of INAIL's liability and the possibilities for compensation from third parties.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation provides important clarifications on the compensation for non-pecuniary damage in cases of occupational diseases, highlighting the need to consider both terminal biological damage and catastrophic damage.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the boundaries between biological damage and moral damage, highlighting the importance of allegations in the compensation for non-economic damages.