Bianucci Law Firm
Unjust enrichment and healthcare services: commentary on order no. 16980 of 2024

Let's analyze ordinance no. 16980 of 2024, which clarifies the principle of unjust enrichment in the case of healthcare services provided without accreditation, highlighting the legal implications and consequences for healthcare facilities.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 21138 of 2024: Compensation for Unjust Enrichment and Recovery Function.

Let’s analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the limits of compensation for unjust enrichment, highlighting the differences between recovery function and corresponding function.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of sentence no. 11659 of 2024: Repetition of undue payment and NASpI.

The ruling no. 11659 of 2024 clarifies the methods for recovering amounts improperly paid as NASpI, highlighting the applicability of Article 2033 of the Civil Code and the principles of graduality and proportionality.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Order No. 9731 of 2024: Unjust Enrichment and Suspensive Condition.

Let’s analyze Order No. 9731 of 2024, which clarifies the contours of unjust enrichment in cases of partial performance related to suspensive conditions and the implications for the parties involved.