Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on the ruling of the Court of Cassation, Criminal Section V, Order No. 55894/2018: Preventive measures and social dangerousness.

Analysis of the ruling of the Court of Cassation regarding preventive measures and the importance of social dangerousness in Italian law. An in-depth look at the principles established by the ECHR.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 24616 of 2023: Autonomy in Criminal Precaution and Preventive Measures

Judgment No. 24616 of 2023 clarifies the delicate balance between criminal caution and preventive measures, highlighting the autonomy of evaluations and the importance of the danger assessment.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 24873 of 2023: Security Measures and Social Dangerousness

Analysis of ruling no. 24873 of 2023, which clarifies the criteria for the application of personal security measures in relation to the social dangerousness of those convicted for criminal associations.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 51407 of 30/11/2023: Reflections on the Differentiated Detention Regime.

Let's analyze the very recent ruling of the Court of Cassation regarding Article 41-bis of the prison system and the implications on the presumption of dangerousness of those sentenced to life imprisonment.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 37849 of 2024 on Social Dangerousness and Preventive Measures.

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Turin provides important insights on the assessment of social dangerousness, highlighting how pending criminal proceedings can influence preventive measures. Let's learn more about this crucial issue.