Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 2157 of 2025: Dismissal for Just Cause and Law 104 Permits

Discover the importance of ruling no. 2157 of 2025, which clarifies the limits on the use of leave under Article 33 of Law 104, highlighting the possibility of dismissal for just cause in cases of abuse.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Order No. 8916 of 2024: Lis Pendens in Dismissal Proceedings

Let's analyze Order No. 8916 of 2024, which clarifies the dynamics of litispendence in the workplace, highlighting the relevance of the status of claimant and defendant in dismissal proceedings.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 10734/2024: The Written Form in Dismissal and the Conciliation Procedure.

Let's analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the importance of written form in dismissals and its relationship with the conciliation procedure under Article 7 of Law no. 604 of 1966.

Bianucci Law Firm
Dismissal for justified objective reason: commentary on Ordinance No. 10627 of 2024.

The ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the obligation of reemployment in dismissals for just cause, highlighting the importance of the interchangeability of duties and the limitations for the employer.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 10286 of 2024: Dismissal and Marriage in Labor Law

Let's analyze ruling no. 10286 of 2024, which clarifies the presumption of dismissal due to marriage and its implications in the context of collective dismissal, with reference to Legislative Decree no. 198 of 2006.

Bianucci Law Firm
Collective Dismissal: Analysis of Ordinance No. 10197 of 2024

Order No. 10197 of 2024 clarifies the importance of specifying professional profiles in the communication of the initiation of the mobility procedure, highlighting the necessary requirements for the legitimacy of collective dismissal.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 8899 of 2024: Antecedent Conduct and Just Cause for Dismissal

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the conditions under which past conduct may justify a dismissal, analyzing its compatibility with the fiduciary duty in the employment relationship.

Bianucci Law Firm
Disciplinary dismissal and unjustified absence: commentary on ruling no. 8956 of 2024.

Judgment No. 8956 of 2024 clarifies the boundaries of disciplinary dismissal for unjustified absences in public employment, emphasizing the importance of the work context and holidays.