Analysis of Judgment No. 8899 of 2024: Preceding Conduct and Just Cause for Dismissal

Judgment No. 8899 of April 4, 2024, by the Court of Cassation serves as an important reference point regarding dismissal for just cause. It clarifies the conditions under which criminal conduct occurring before the start of the employment relationship can affect current employment relationships. This article will explore the implications of this judgment and the related regulations, making its provisions understandable.

The Regulatory Context

The regulation of dismissal in Italy is primarily governed by the Civil Code, specifically Articles 2104, 2105, and 2106. These articles establish the obligations of diligence and loyalty of the worker and the conditions for the legitimacy of dismissal. In its ruling, the Court focused on a crucial aspect: the distinction between unlawful conduct occurring during the employment relationship and that which predates it.

  • Unlawful conduct during the relationship: can justify dismissal for just cause.
  • Prior unlawful conduct: only if irrevocably condemned and incompatible with the fiduciary bond can justify dismissal.
  • The employer must demonstrate the negative impact of such conduct on the employment relationship.

Analysis of the Judgment's Summary

Conduct constituting a crime preceding the establishment of the relationship - Just cause for dismissal - Configurability - Conditions - Specific case. In the context of dismissal for just cause, only conduct carried out while the employment relationship is ongoing can strictly lawfully integrate a disciplinary responsibility of the employee; otherwise, there is no obligation of diligence and/or loyalty under Articles 2104 and 2105 of the Civil Code, the violation of which can be sanctioned under Article 2106 of the Civil Code; however, conduct constituting a crime committed before the establishment of the employment relationship may, irrespective of specific contractual provisions, integrate just cause for dismissal as long as they have been judged with an irrevocable conviction that occurred while the relationship was already in place, and are found - through a jurisdictional verification to be carried out both in abstract and in concrete - incompatible with the persistence of the fiduciary bond that characterizes it. (In this case, the Supreme Court confirmed the challenged ruling declaring the illegitimacy of the disciplinary dismissal initiated for facts that occurred a long time ago, for which an irrevocable conviction had intervened even before the establishment of the employment relationship, and the employer had not specifically indicated their current negative impact on the reality of the relationship, limiting itself to presenting a mere associated risk).

This summary clearly highlights that dismissal for just cause can only be configured in the presence of conduct carried out during the employment relationship, unless an incompatibility with the fiduciary bond is demonstrated, even in the case of pre-existing conduct.

Conclusions

Judgment No. 8899 of 2024 represents an important clarification regarding just cause for dismissal. The Court of Cassation asserts that a thorough evaluation of the worker's conduct, both in abstract and in concrete terms, is essential to establish the legitimacy of a dismissal. Employers must be able to demonstrate not only the irrevocable condemnation of prior conduct but also their current impact on the employment relationship. This decision provides food for thought for both employers and employees, emphasizing the importance of a relationship of mutual trust in the workplace.

Bianucci Law Firm