Judgment No. 46027 of 2024: Right of Access to Audio Files in Review.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation provides important clarifications on the right to access audio files in the case of complex precautionary measures. Let's analyze the consequences of this decision for the right of defense and the implications for the management of wiretaps.
Supreme Court Criminal No. 46833/2023: Legitimacy of Precautionary Measures and International Wiretaps.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation confirms the admissibility of digital evidence obtained through international cooperation, clarifying the rights of defense and procedural guarantees in the context of mafia associations.
Analysis of Judgment No. 30040/2024: Wiretaps and Serious Indications.
The recent ruling no. 30040 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the limits of the legitimacy review concerning wiretaps and the assessment of the evidentiary weight. Let’s explore the details and legal implications together.
Commentary on Judgment No. 27089 of 17/03/2023: Wiretaps and the Right to a Fair Hearing
Let’s explore ruling no. 27089 of March 17, 2023, which clarifies the use of audio interceptions in the deliberation room and the respect for the right to a fair trial. A thorough analysis to understand the legal implications of this decision.
Wiretaps and Admissibility of Evidence: Commentary on Ruling No. 24492 of 2023
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the issue of the inadmissibility of wiretaps and the principle of derived invalidity, providing a significant interpretation for criminal proceedings.
Wiretapping and Admissibility of Evidence: Commentary on Judgment No. 25592 of 2023
The ruling no. 25592 of 2023 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the inadmissibility of evidence obtained through interceptions in the absence of a valid title for the devices. Let’s explore the legal implications of this decision together.
Analysis of Judgment No. 48838 of 2023: Messaging and Interceptions
Let us examine ruling no. 48838 of 2023, which clarifies the applicability of the interception regulations to messaging exchanged via the Sky ECC platform, highlighting the conditions for the acquisition of evidence.
Commentary on Judgment No. 49627 of 2023: Legitimacy of Concealed Wiretaps.
The recent ruling clarifies the role of the public prosecutor in the transmission of interception orders, highlighting the importance of investigative secrecy and the legitimacy of the partial redaction of information.