Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 3809 of 2024: Immunity of Members of the European Parliament.

An analysis of ruling no. 3809 of 2024 concerning the immunity of Members of the European Parliament in relation to 'extra moenia' statements and the concept of defamation.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on the Judgment of the Cassation Court, Criminal Section V, No. 28561 of 2018: The Underestimation of Crimes Against Personal Freedom.

Let's analyze the ruling of the Court of Cassation that upheld the conviction for stalking and child abduction, highlighting the importance of protecting minors and the rights of parents.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 28390 of 2024: Responsibility and Communication in Marriage

The ruling of the Court of Cassation in 2024 clarifies the dynamics of liability in cases of mental reservation in marriage, highlighting the absence of communication obligations between spouses and the freedom of marital choice.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 28502 of 2024: Preventive Seizure and Derogatory Tax Regime

Let us analyze the ruling no. 28502 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation, focused on the reviewability of preventive seizure orders and the assessment of the prerequisites for access to favorable tax regimes.

Bianucci Law Firm
Sexual Violence and Dissent: Commentary on Judgment No. 29356 of 2024.

The ruling reaffirms the importance of explicit consent in sexual violence, clarifying that initial dissent cannot be overridden by subsequent opposing behaviors.

Bianucci Law Firm
Order No. 17738 of 2024: the right to be forgotten and defamation.

The ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies how to balance the right to be forgotten and the interest in preserving news, with a focus on the lawfulness of the initial publication.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Order No. 15755 of 2024: Investigative Journalism and the Right to Report.

Order No. 15755 of 2024 provides important clarifications on the relationship between investigative journalism and defamation, highlighting the conditions of justification for journalists in the exercise of their right to report.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 51399 of 2023: The Right Balance between Security and Freedom of Correspondence.

The recent ruling no. 51399 of 2023 emphasizes the legality of the retention of correspondence for inmates subjected to the regime under Article 41-bis, highlighting constitutional rights and security needs.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 16468 of 2024: Flaws in Motivation in the DASPO

Let’s analyze the recent ruling no. 16468 of 2024 concerning the validation of the DASPO measure, highlighting the importance of the reasoning and the legal consequences of a flaw in this area.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 16153 of 2024 and the Crime of Restructuring the Fascist Party.

Let's analyze ruling no. 16153 of 2024, which highlights the configurability of the crime referred to in Article 5 of Law 645/1952 in relation to the response to the 'call of the present' and the 'Roman salute'.