Judgment no. 26886 of 2024 addresses the issue of fraudulent bankruptcy from preventive composition, clarifying the sanctioning treatment provided by bankruptcy law and its constitutional legitimacy.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the requirements for the independence of the expert in the preventive agreement, highlighting the legal and practical implications for professionals in the field.
An analysis of judgment no. 17962 of 2024 that clarifies the conditions for recognizing pre-emption in the preventive agreement, providing useful guidance for professionals and debtors.
Let’s analyze order no. 20036 of July 22, 2024, which clarifies the jurisdiction of the ordinary judge in the event of a claim for damages following a negative vote by the Revenue Agency in a preventive agreement.