Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 936 of 2025: Recognition of the finality of a ruling in tax proceedings.

The ruling no. 936 of 2025 by the Court of Cassation establishes very important news regarding the res judicata effect of criminal judgments in the tax context, clarifying the applicability of Article 21-bis of Legislative Decree No. 74 of 2000 also to prior situations.

Bianucci Law Firm
Tax assessment and extension of deadlines: commentary on Ordinance no. 600 of 2025.

Let's analyze Ordinance No. 600 of 2025, which clarifies the conditions for the extension of deadlines in tax assessment matters, highlighting the importance of the criminal complaint in the tax process.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 2157 of 2025: Dismissal for Just Cause and Law 104 Permits

Discover the importance of ruling no. 2157 of 2025, which clarifies the limits on the use of leave under Article 33 of Law 104, highlighting the possibility of dismissal for just cause in cases of abuse.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 2034 of 2025 and Compensation in International Air Transport.

Analysis of ruling no. 2034 of 2025 regarding compensation for delays in international air transport under the Warsaw Convention. Discover how case law addresses damage in re ipsa and presumed damage.

Bianucci Law Firm
Medical liability and damage from unwanted birth: commentary on order no. 1903 of 2025.

The ruling of the Supreme Court clarifies the prerequisites for civil liability in the event of harm from unwanted birth, delving into the role of medical information and the burden of proof.

Bianucci Law Firm
Compensation for damage due to loss of family relationship: commentary on Ordinance No. 761 of 2025.

Order No. 761 of 2025 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the motivational criteria for the assessment of damages due to the loss of parental relationship, highlighting the importance of transparency in calculating compensatory amounts.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 575 of 2025: Territorial Jurisdiction and Responsibility of Judges

The recent Order No. 575 of 2025 clarifies the rules of territorial jurisdiction in cases of civil liability of magistrates, highlighting the distinction between intentional and negligent behaviors, and the related legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 1653 of 2025: The Principle of 'Favor Rei' in the Disciplinary Responsibility of Judges.

Let’s explore the recent ruling no. 1653 of 2025, which clarifies the applicability of the principle of 'favor rei' in disciplinary matters for judges, highlighting its implications and limits.

Bianucci Law Firm
Supreme Court No. 2939 of 2024: Inadmissibility of the Appeal and Legal Costs

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the implications of the inadmissibility of the appeal against the rejection of the opposition to the dismissal, highlighting the non-condemnation of legal costs for the complainant.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 305 of 2024: Preventive Seizure and Standing of the Third Party.

An analysis of judgment no. 305 of 2024 on the standing of a third party to challenge preventive seizure aimed at confiscation, with references to Italian and European regulations.