Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 3059 of 30/10/2024: Legal Requalification and Mitigating Circumstances

An analysis of ruling no. 3059 of October 30, 2024, which clarifies the role of the referring judge in granting mitigating circumstances in the case of legal requalification of the act.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 3063 of 2024: Notification to the appointed defense attorney for defendants detained abroad.

Analysis of ruling no. 3063 of 2024, which clarifies the methods of notification of the summons for trial for defendants detained abroad, highlighting the importance of delivery to the appointed defense attorney.

Bianucci Law Firm
Domestic Violence: Analysis of Judgment No. 1268 of 2024

Let's explore ruling no. 1268 of 2024, which clarifies the relevance of the deprivation of economic independence as an abusive behavior and its legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 1270 of 2024: The Rationale of the Judgment and the Powers of the Court of Appeal.

Let's explore the recent ruling no. 1270 of the Court of Appeal of Cagliari, which clarifies the methods of supplementing the reasoning by the appellate judge and the implications for the defendant.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 604 of 2024: Precautionary Measures and Registration in the Criminal Record.

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 604 of 2024, which clarifies the legitimacy of precautionary measures even in the absence of registration in the criminal record, highlighting the legal and practical implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 614 of 2024: Extradition and Precautionary Measures

Analysis of the recent ruling by the Court of Appeal of Rome regarding precautionary measures in the context of extradition, focusing on the legitimacy of the suspension of coercive measures for internal justice needs.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 1919 of 2024: Appeal and Obligation of Specific Statement of Reasons.

Ruling no. 1919 of 2024 clarifies the importance of specificity in the grounds for appeal, highlighting how the lack of details can compromise the right to defense and the judge's assessment.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 3096 of 2024: Online Fraud and Impaired Defense.

Analysis of ruling no. 3096 of 2024 clarifying the conditions for the aggravating factor of diminished defense in online fraud, highlighting the vulnerability of buyers in verifying products and sellers.

Bianucci Law Firm
Ruling No. 2714 of 2024: The Right to Translation in Personal Protective Measures.

Analysis of ruling no. 2714/2024 concerning late translation in precautionary measures and its impact on the defense rights of the foreign-language defendant.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 1675 of 2024: Mitigating Circumstances in Kidnapping.

The ruling no. 1675 of 2024 by the Court of Assize of Appeal of Rome clarifies the conditions for recognizing mitigating circumstances in the crime of kidnapping for extortion purposes. An in-depth analysis to understand the useful contribution to the truth process.