Judgment no. 22135 of 2023 clarifies that, during an emergency period, the lack of digital signature on attachments does not result in the inadmissibility of the appeal to the Court of Cassation, provided that they are non-essential documents.
Let’s analyze the recent ruling no. 29185 of 2024, which provides important clarifications on the validity of the election of domicile and the authentication of the defendant's signature in the context of criminal appeals.
Judgment No. 29322 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the consequences of the defender's failure to provide a digital signature in relation to appeals, highlighting the lack of justifications for malfunctions of the digital signature.
Order No. 16446 of 2024 clarifies the importance of the signature by the president and the rapporteur in the decisions to dismiss the appeal process, highlighting the substantive nature of such acts.
The recent ruling no. 48545 of 2023 clarifies the rules regarding the electronic filing of legal documents, highlighting the inadmissibility of appeals lacking digital signatures. Let's explore the details and implications of this decision together.
The recent ruling no. 14882 of 2024 clarifies the importance of the digital signature of the defense lawyer in relation to electronically filed motions, highlighting its authentication value and the practical consequences of this provision in criminal proceedings.
The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Campobasso clarifies the consequences of the lack of digital signature in appeals, highlighting the challenges of the transitional regime established by Legislative Decree No. 150 of 2022.
In-depth analysis of order no. 11045 of 2024, which clarifies the legitimacy of the printed indication of the responsible party in tax liquidation and assessment acts, in accordance with law 549 of 1995.