Let's analyze Ordinance No. 965 of 2025 from the Court of Appeal of Salerno, focusing on the exemption from legal fees and the validity of substitute declarations in the Italian legal context.
Analysis of the Supreme Court ruling regarding the administrative nature of the order to pay the unified contribution and its implications for the parties involved.
Let’s analyze the recent Order No. 20922 of 2024, which clarifies the issue of passive solidarity in professional fees for lawyers, highlighting the importance of unified legal services even in extrajudicial activities.
Order No. 19228 of July 12, 2024 clarifies the methods of compensation for professional fees for extrajudicial services and in civil and criminal proceedings, emphasizing the importance of the correct qualification of the procedure.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation establishes that the costs of central heating must be divided based on actual consumption, nullifying the criterion of property thousandths. Let's explore the legal and practical implications of this decision.
An analysis of judgment no. 51681 of November 30, 2023, which clarifies the dynamics of acquittal and liability for legal costs in the criminal context.
The recent ruling of the Regional Tax Commission of Florence clarifies the conditions for the applicability of the environmental hygiene fee for non-domestic users, highlighting the issues related to municipal regulations that do not comply with current laws.
We analyze order no. 10367 of 2024, which clarifies the methods for determining the value of the case in the event of optional litisconsortium, highlighting the importance of considering only the claim with the highest value for the determination of fees.
Analysis of the recent ruling by the Court of Cassation regarding the payment of professional fees, clarifying the client's obligations towards the lawyer and the legal implications in case of dispute.
Judgment No. 11431 of 2024 clarifies the rights of defenders in state-funded legal representation, establishing that the omission of measures regarding the determination of fees is equivalent to a denial, with significant implications for access to justice.