A recent decision by the Court of Cassation clarifies the criteria for assessing moral damages in the case of a road accident, highlighting the importance of a concrete rather than abstract evaluation of the suffering endured by the injured party.
Let’s analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the dynamics of the burden of proof in the event of road accidents, highlighting the implications for compensations and the rights of the injured parties.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation provides important insights on liability in the event of road accidents, highlighting the distinction between biological damage and moral damage. Let's explore the details of the ruling and its legal implications.
In this article, we analyze the ruling no. 5932/2021 of the Court of Cassation, which deals with civil liability in the case of a traffic accident and the compensation for aesthetic damage. We delve into the legal principles involved and the implications for the injured parties.
Let's analyze the ruling no. 6856 of October 31, 2024, of the Court of Appeal of Rome, which upheld the rejection of the claim for damages for the death of a motorcyclist, in terms of civil liability and the dynamics of the accident.