Judgment No. 20270 of 2022: Offenses in Seismic Zone and Autonomy of the Legal Cases.
Let's analyze ruling no. 20270 of 2022, which clarifies the autonomy of the offenses related to the absence of written notice and the lack of authorization for construction interventions in seismic areas, highlighting the prerequisites and the differences between the two cases.
Judgment No. 21192/2023: The Unity of the Construction Work and the Necessity of Authorizations.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation highlights the importance of a unified assessment of construction works, emphasizing the legal implications for the requirement of permits and authorizations.
Judgment no. 18267 of 2023: ex post authorization and violations in seismic areas.
Let's analyze ruling no. 18267 of 2023, which clarifies the lack of extinguishing effect of the subsequent authorization for works in seismic areas. Let's explore the meaning and legal implications of this decision.
Commentary on Judgment No. 50766 of 2023: Landscape Crimes and Authorizations
Let's explore the meaning of the recent Judgment No. 50766 of 2023 concerning landscape crimes and the conditions for excluding landscape authorization for outdoor installations in protected areas.
Judgment No. 50500 of 2023: Analysis of the Boundary Between Urban and Landscape Offences.
In a recent ruling, the Court of Cassation clarified the distinctions between construction and landscape offenses in relation to work carried out in areas subject to hydrogeological constraints. Discover the legal implications of this ruling.
Judgment No. 9801 of 2024: Extra-institutional Assignments and Compatibility in Public Employment
The ruling no. 9801 of 2024 clarifies the rules regarding extrainstitutional assignments for public employees, highlighting the need for employer authorization even for unpaid positions.