The ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies that the opposition to a payment order by an heir constitutes a tacit acceptance of the inheritance, establishing important principles on inheritance law.
The ruling of the Court of Appeal of Bologna clarifies the implications of raising the objection of territorial incompetence in the opposition proceedings to a payment order, establishing the importance of the judge's jurisdiction in determining legal costs.
Let's analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Rome that clarifies the moment of filing for the appeal in the opposition procedure against the administrative injunction order, providing useful guidelines for lawyers and industry professionals.
The recent ruling of the Supreme Court clarifies the methods for interrupting the prescription of easements, highlighting that the notice of default is not suitable for interrupting the prescription period. An in-depth analysis of meaning and legal implications.
The ruling no. 16031 of 2024 clarifies the jurisdiction of the ordinary judge regarding mandates for the collection of credits arising from administrative sanctions, highlighting the distinction between private obligations and tax injunctions.
Let us analyze the recent Ordinance no. 10692 of 2024, which clarifies the binding content of the notice of formal demand to comply and its implications for taxpayers and the authorities responsible for tax collection.
Let's analyze ruling no. 9680 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation regarding the opposition to injunctions and the functional competence of judicial offices, in order to understand the practical and legal implications of this important decision.