Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 740 of 2025: The Extrapenal Effects of Plea Bargaining in Disciplinary Sanctions.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the connections between criminal proceedings and disciplinary sanctions, highlighting the importance of the principle tempus regit actum for the assessment of the effects of a plea bargain judgment.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 573 of 2025: The Loan for Use Contract and Family Cohabitation

The recent ordinance of the Court of Appeal of Turin offers important insights into the regulation of the loan for use contract, particularly regarding its duration and the conditions of use by the borrower.

Bianucci Law Firm
Interpretation of Contracts: Commentary on Order No. 353 of 2025

The order highlights the importance of contractual interpretation by the trial judge and the limits of appeal to the Supreme Court, clarifying how criticisms of interpretation must be specific and justified.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 1187 of 2024: Appeals and Tempus Regit Actum

Judgment No. 1187 of 2024 analyzes the applicable regime regarding appeals in the case of succession of different provisions. Let’s explore together the details and legal implications of this important intervention by the Court.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 44519 of 2024: Tax Debt Restructuring and Seizure.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies how the agreement for the restructuring of tax debt affects the measure of confiscation, highlighting the importance of the principle of proportionality in tax criminal law.

Bianucci Law Firm
Reflections on the ruling of the Italian Supreme Court, Section II, No. 18610 of 2017: Sale and Producer Liability.

The ruling analyzes the distinction between contractual and non-contractual liability in the context of a dispute over vehicle defects, establishing important principles for consumers and manufacturers.

Bianucci Law Firm
Evidence in the Sales Contract: Commentary on the Judgment of the Court of Cassation, No. 3373/2010.

Let’s analyze the ruling of the Court of Cassation no. 3373 of 2010, which clarifies the burden of proof in cases of contractual liability for defects in the sold goods and the importance of presumptions in the assessment of evidence.

Bianucci Law Firm
Contract Interpretation and Civil Liability: Commentary on Cass. Civ. No. 12973 of 2020

The ruling of the Court of Cassation no. 12973 of 2020 provides significant insights into the interpretation of contractual clauses and the relationship between civil and criminal liability, highlighting the importance of a correct application of contractual norms.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 30600 of 2024: Structural Abnormality in Direct Judgment.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation on direct judgment emphasizes the importance of reasoning in the judge's decisions, highlighting the consequences of a measure lacking justification.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 28144 of 2024: Clarifications on Direct Citation to Judgment and the Limit of the Penalty.

Analysis of ruling no. 28144 of 2024 that clarifies the modalities for exercising criminal action, particularly regarding direct summons to trial and the limits established by Article 550 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.