Let’s analyze the recent ruling no. 16006 of 2024, which clarifies the evidentiary procedures in third-party opposition against mobiliary execution in the context of enforced collection. A focus on evidentiary limitations and the required documents.
An in-depth analysis of Order No. 10939 of 2024 that clarifies the criteria for the suspension of collection and the implications for taxpayers regarding enforcement title.
Let us analyze the recent Ordinance no. 10692 of 2024, which clarifies the binding content of the notice of formal demand to comply and its implications for taxpayers and the authorities responsible for tax collection.
Let's examine the important Order No. 9817 of 2024, which clarifies the procedures for registering a mortgage and the necessity of notifying the payment request. A fundamental ruling for those facing tax collection.
The order of the Court of Cassation of 2024 clarifies the methods of notification of payment notices by collection agents, highlighting the applicability of the rules on ordinary postal service.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the limits of contractual assumption regarding tax debts, highlighting how the Revenue Agency cannot seek recourse against the assuming party. Let's explore the details and legal consequences of this decision together.
The recent ruling no. 9170 of 2024 clarifies the responsibility of directors in the context of tax collection, highlighting limits and areas of application. Let's explore the details and legal implications together.
Let's analyze ruling no. 11661 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation, which clarifies the passive legitimacy in the opposition proceedings against tax collection notices for violations of the highway code and the importance of notifying the verification report.
Let’s analyze Ordinance No. 10795 of 2024, which clarifies the limits of the collection agent's suspension power, highlighting the lack of discretion and the exceptional cases provided by law.
Analysis of Judgment No. 17029 of 2022 of the Court of Cassation regarding the participation of individuals in the crime of usury and the legal implications for the agents involved in the recovery of usurious debts.