Reflections on the Judgment of the Court of Cassation, Section II, No. 18610 of 2017: Sale and Producer Liability
The judgment of the Court of Cassation No. 18610 of 2017 provides significant insights regarding the distinction between contractual and non-contractual liability, particularly in the context of the sale of consumer goods. In this article, we will analyze the main points of the decision, highlighting the implications for consumers and producers.
The Legal Issue
The dispute originated from a warranty action brought by T.A. against Fiat Auto S.p.A. for an alleged malfunction of a vehicle. The Court of Taranto had rejected the appellant's appeal, arguing that Fiat's liability was exclusively non-contractual in nature. The Court upheld this position, clarifying that the producer's liability is governed by Legislative Decree No. 206 of 2005, known as the Consumer Code.
The Court of Cassation excluded the contractual liability of the producer, emphasizing the importance of correctly identifying the legal parties involved in the transaction.
The Fundamental Distinctions
The Court highlighted several crucial distinctions:
- Contractual Liability vs. Non-Contractual Liability: The Court established that, in this case, the producer's liability could not be considered contractual since there was no direct link between the consumer and Fiat Auto, which acted as the producer.
- Chain of Sale: According to the regulations, the consumer must always address their immediate seller for contractual actions, while they can pursue the producer only for non-contractual liabilities related to product defects.
Implications for Consumers and Producers
This ruling underscores the importance of understanding one's positions and rights within the sales chain. Consumers need to be aware that:
- They can only take action against the direct seller for conformity defects.
- They can only turn to the producer in cases of damage caused by product defects, according to non-contractual norms.
For producers, the ruling represents protection against direct actions from consumers, unless there is evidence of liability for direct damages.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the judgment of the Court of Cassation, Section II, No. 18610 of 2017 serves as a guide for understanding the complexities of liabilities related to the sale of goods. It emphasizes the need for a clear distinction between contractual and non-contractual liabilities, and the central role of the seller in the distribution chain. Understanding these principles is essential for both consumers, who seek to protect their rights, and for producers, who must navigate liability regulations in a competitive market.
Bianucci Law Firm
We constantly follow regulatory and jurisprudential developments, offering updated analyses and innovative solutions. We share legal developments to foster a more informed legal culture.
Latest Articles
Categories
- administrative law (3)
- aesthetic damage (1)
- biological damage (1)
- bullying (3)
- burden of proof (1)
- case law (15)
- civil law (47)
- civil liability (40)
- civil_law (1)
- civil_liability (5)
- commercial law (1)
- compensation for damages (9)
- compensations (1)
- consumer law (1)
- contracts (1)
- Court of Cassation (1)
- Covid-19 (2)
- criminal law (5)
- criminal liability (1)
- Damage assessment (3)
- damage compensation (2)
- damages compensation (38)
- damages_compensation (10)
- employer_liability (1)
- employer_responsibility (1)
- European law (1)
- family law (4)
- family_law (3)
- financial law (1)
- health law (19)
- healthcare (2)
- healthcare law (1)
- healthcare liability (6)
- INAIL compensation (1)
- informed consent (2)
- inheritance law (1)
- insurance (5)
- insurance law (1)
- insurance_law (2)
- jurisdiction (1)
- jurisprudence (11)
- justice (1)
- labor law (21)
- labor_law (5)
- law of evidence (1)
- lease (1)
- legal expenses (1)
- liability (2)
- medical liability (13)
- medical malpractice (3)
- minors' rights (1)
- moral damage (3)
- neighboring rights (1)
- noise pollution (1)
- non-economic damage (1)
- Non-pecuniary damage (4)
- Occupational Disease (1)
- occupational diseases (4)
- occupational safety (1)
- occupational_diseases (1)
- prescription (1)
- prison system (1)
- private law (1)
- professional liability (19)
- property rights (1)
- protection of workers (1)
- protection of workers' rights (1)
- public administration (1)
- public administration liability (1)
- right to health (3)
- right to life (1)
- road accidents (5)
- self-determination (1)
- social security (2)
- social security law (1)
- statute of limitations (1)
- tax law (3)
- Tax litigation (1)
- technical consultancy (1)
- testimonial_evidence (1)
- tort law (4)
- tort liability (1)
- tourism law (1)
- wildlife (1)
- worker dignity (1)
- worker protection (1)
- workers' protection (1)
- workplace accidents (2)
- Workplace injuries (3)
- workplace safety (1)
Tags
Accident accident prevention law accidents accountant acoustic emissions active legitimacy art. 141 Insurance Code article 2087 civil code asbestos asbestos exposure biological damage blood transfusions burden of proof case law case_law Cassation Cassation ruling Catanzaro court catastrophic damage causal link childbirth civil law civil liability cohabitation compensatio lucri cum damno compensation compensation action compensation for damages compensation tables congenital malformations Consob Consumer Code contagion contractual liability corporate liability Court of Appeal Court of Cassation Court of Cassation 19744/2014 Covid-19 criminal law criminal liability damage assessment damage compensation damage evidence damages damages assessment damages compensation death diagnostic errors differential damage disability insurance dismissal emotional bond emotional bonds employer liability employer_liability equity evidence failure to supervise family law guidelines gynecologist HCV health law healthcare liability heating systems heirs hepatitis C virus I.N.A.I.L. iatrogenic damage iatrogenic injury INAIL income tax indemnity indemnity law informed consent injury from fall insurance insurance coverage insurance policies insurance policy intentional injuries joint liability judgment judgment 3767/2018 jurisdiction jurisprudence labor law landlord liability law law 194 legal expenses Legislative Decree 81/2008 legitimate reliance liability Lyell syndrome maintenance of public works malpractice Marche Region medical expenses medical liability medical malpractice medical negligence medical record mesothelioma Milan Court Milan ruling Ministry of Justice mobbing monetary penalty moral damage municipal liability Naples negligent arson newborn non-economic damage non-economic_damage non-pecuniary damage nosocomial infection nosocomial infections oath occupational disease occupational diseases occupational health package travel parental damage parental liability parental supervision passengers pension personal injuries personal injury pets premature birth professional liability property rights psychological suffering public administration public liability refusal of transfusion remedy Revenue Agency right to compensation right to health right to life road accident road accidents road traffic accidents ruling ruling 1361/2014 ruling 2023 ruling 5947 ruling Court of Naples safety safety of systems safety regulations self-determination settlement statute of limitations strepitus fori substitution Supreme Court Supreme Court 2023 Supreme Court ruling Supreme Court ruling 2023 surgical intervention survivor's pension survivors' pension tax law taxation technical consulting technical liability testimonial evidence tort liability traffic accident unjust detention unlawful occupation usufruct VAT water damage wildlife witness testimony Work work environment work-related liability. work-related stress worker health workers' rights workplace accident workplace accidents workplace injuries workplace safety