Ruling No. 44941 of 2024: Inspections and Guarantees for Defenders
Let us analyze the recent ruling no. 44941 of 2024 that clarifies the limits of inspections and searches at law firms, highlighting the guarantees provided by Article 103 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Assignment of credit for guarantee purposes: commentary on ruling no. 19358 of 2024.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the mechanisms of the assignment of credit for guarantee purposes, highlighting the legal implications and the rights of the parties involved.
Suretyship and liability: commentary on Ordinance No. 16822 of 2024
Order no. 16822 of 2024 clarifies the responsibilities of the guarantor in relation to the deterioration of the debtor's financial conditions and their prerogatives as a minority shareholder.
Analysis of Judgment No. 19505 of 2024: The Pledge of Productive Movable Assets.
Let’s discover the meaning of the recent ruling no. 19505 of 2024, which clarifies the implementation methods of the pledge of productive movable assets and the distinction from non-possessory pledge. An important decision for the real security law.
Compensation and Extension of Terms: Analysis of Order No. 19395 of 2024
Order No. 19395 of 2024 provides important clarifications on the exception of compensation and the reinstatement of terms in civil law, highlighting the protection of defensive guarantees in the process.
Commentary on Ordinance No. 18232 of 2024: Res Judicata and Guarantees.
Let's explore the importance of ruling no. 18232 of 2024 regarding the limits of the authority of res judicata and the implications on guarantees and revocatory actions.
Analysis of Judgment No. 16289 of 2024: Guarantee and Good Faith.
The Court of Cassation clarifies the limits of the creditor's liability in case of failure to pursue the guarantor, establishing that good faith cannot be invoked without specific objections.
Commentary on Judgment No. 16132 of 2024: Protective Measures and Evidence Tampering
Let's analyze the ruling no. 16132 of 2024, which clarifies the requirements for the application of personal precautionary measures in relation to the risk of evidence tampering, providing an important indication on the investigative needs of the defendants.