Judgment No. 27622 of 2023: Omitted Examination and Factual Error in the Extraordinary Appeal.
An analysis of ruling no. 27622 of 2023 by the Court of Cassation, which clarifies the conditions under which the failure to examine a ground for appeal does not constitute a factual error. Let us explore the legal principles involved and their implications.
Analysis of Judgment No. 48327 of 2023: Extraordinary Appeal for Factual Error
The ruling no. 48327 of 2023 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the procedures for managing the extraordinary appeal for factual error, highlighting the immediacy of the decision and the simplification of procedural phases.
Contractual assumption of tax debt: ruling no. 9353 of 2024 and its implications.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the limits of contractual assumption regarding tax debts, highlighting how the Revenue Agency cannot seek recourse against the assuming party. Let's explore the details and legal consequences of this decision together.
Order no. 11333 of 2024: The judge's duty to determine part-time working hours.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the judge's duty to establish the temporal arrangements for part-time work, emphasizing the importance of ensuring rights for workers without compromising contractual autonomy.
Commentary on ruling no. 10680 of 2024 on the statute of limitations for non-compete agreements.
Let's analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Turin regarding the statute of limitations of the consideration for the non-compete agreement, highlighting the legal and practical implications for the parties involved.
The Nullity of Indeterminate Clauses in Agricultural Lease Agreements: Commentary on Order No. 10309 of 2024.
Let's analyze the important ruling of the Court of Cassation that establishes the nullity of generic clauses in rural land leases, highlighting the importance of the determinability of the contractual object.
Liability of Inail: Judgment no. 26620/2024 of the Court of Cassation and the Rights of Workers Exposed to Asbestos.
The recent ruling of the Supreme Court addresses the complex issue of INAIL's liability in the case of incorrect certification of asbestos exposure, clarifying workers' rights and the importance of relying on the information provided by social security institutions.