The judgment no. 26620 of October 14, 2024, of the Court of Cassation has brought to light crucial aspects regarding the responsibility of Inail concerning the certification of exposure to asbestos. This ruling is particularly relevant for workers who, like A.A., face complex situations related to their social security and accurate information from public entities.
A.A. had requested and obtained a certification of exposure to asbestos from Inail, essential for accessing pension benefits. However, later on, Inail revoked this certification, leading to the rejection of the pension application by Inps. A.A. then appealed, seeking justice for the revocation that negatively impacted his economic and work situation.
The responsibility of the public administration for the damage arising from the breach of reliance on the correctness of administrative action is contractual in nature.
The Court of Cassation reiterated that the responsibility of Inail, arising from the issuance of an incorrect certification, falls within the category of contractual liability. This is a fundamental point, as it implies that Inail not only must ensure the accuracy of the information provided but also respect the reliance placed by workers. Jurisprudence has clarified that, in similar cases, the social security entity is required to compensate for damages resulting from errors in certification.
The judgment no. 26620/2024 represents an important step forward in the protection of the rights of workers exposed to asbestos. It emphasizes the need for Inail to manage with care and responsibility the certifications issued, so that workers can rely on them for their retirement decisions. The importance of a properly functioning social security system cannot be underestimated, as it directly affects the lives of those who have dedicated years to work in risky conditions.