Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 1188 of 2024: Substitute Penalties and Burden of the Defense

Analysis of judgment no. 1188 of 2024 regarding substitute penalties for short custodial sentences and the burden of the defense in the appeal process. Let’s explore how the Court has clarified these crucial aspects.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 45583 of 2024: Substitute Penalties and Conditional Suspension.

Analysis of ruling no. 45583 of 2024 regarding alternative penalties and conditional suspension of the sentence, highlighting legislative innovations and their impact on defendants' rights.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on ruling no. 45829 of 2024: substitute penalties and the competence of the judge of referral.

Analysis of ruling no. 45829 of 2024 regarding the application of substitute penalties in the event of annulment with referral. An in-depth look at the transitional provisions introduced by the Cartabia Reform.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 45859 of 2024: Substitute Penalties and Evaluation of Criminal Records

Analysis of ruling no. 45859 of October 22, 2024, on the assessment of criminal records in relation to alternative sentences, highlighting the innovations introduced by Legislative Decree 150/2022.

Bianucci Law Firm
Reflections on the Judgment of the Court of Cassation No. 37796 of 2020: Corruption and Accessory Penalties

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation raises important questions about the constitutional legitimacy of Article 317-bis of the Penal Code regarding the perpetual disqualification from public office in the event of a conviction for corruption offenses. Let us analyze the implications of this decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Cass. pen., Sez. III, n. 36329/2024: The Importance of Mandatory Seizure in Tax Criminal Law

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation emphasizes the mandatory nature of the confiscation of illegal profits and the importance of accessory penalties in tax criminal law, providing food for thought for legal scholars and taxpayers.

Bianucci Law Firm
Substitute Penalties and Appeal Judgment: Analysis of Ruling No. 30711 of 2024

The Court of Appeal of Genoa rules on the applicability of substitute penalties, clarifying the methods for obtaining the consent of the defendant and the conditions for their application in the second-instance trial.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 26285 of 2024: Driving Without a License and Recidivism

Analysis of ruling no. 26285 of 2024 on driving without a license aggravated by recidivism, with a focus on punitive and regulatory implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Ruling No. 26557 of 2024: Substitute Penalties and Conditional Suspension of the Sentence

The recent ruling no. 26557 of 2024 by the Court of Appeal of Naples clarifies the limits of substitute penalties in relation to conditional suspension of the sentence, highlighting the principle of non-retroactivity of less favorable provisions.

Bianucci Law Firm
Order No. 18037 of 2024: Financial Leasing and Anti-Usury Regulation

Order No. 18037 of 2024 clarifies the distinction between penalties for non-compliance and usurious interest rates in financial leasing, providing important guidance for contractual practices.