• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Reflections on the Judgment of the Court of Cassation no. 37796 of 2020: Corruption and Accessory Penalties

The ruling of the Court of Cassation no. 37796 of December 30, 2020, represents an important moment of reflection on the regulation of accessory penalties, particularly regarding the perpetual disqualification from public office. The central issue concerns the compatibility of this measure with the principles of proportionality and individualization of punishment, established by articles 3 and 27 of the Italian Constitution.

The Context of the Judgment

The Court examined the appeal presented by R.A., a public official convicted of corruption. The ruling of the Court of Brescia, which imposed the penalty of perpetual disqualification, was challenged for violation of the law. The defense attorneys argued that Article 317-bis of the Penal Code, which provides for the automatic application of such a penalty in the case of a conviction with a sentence exceeding three years, is manifestly unreasonable and in conflict with constitutional principles.

The rigidity of the sanctioning system and its indifference to the structural characteristics of punitive treatment outlined in the Constitution are amplified by the perpetual nature of the accessory penalty provided for in Article 317-bis of the Penal Code.

The Implications of the Judgment

The Court noted that the automatic application of perpetual disqualification does not allow for calibrating the sanction based on the severity of the committed crime. In fact, the norm does not distinguish between conducts of varying severity that could fall under the same article of law. Such rigidity could be disproportionate, especially in cases of lesser wrongdoing.

It is important to note that the Court referred to several rulings of the Constitutional Court that highlight the importance of a flexible and proportionate sanctioning system. The accessory penalty, by its nature, must be modulated based on the severity of the act and the personality of the convicted individual.

  • The rigidity of the perpetual accessory penalty is incompatible with the principle of rehabilitation of the offender.
  • Sanctions must be personalized and not applied automatically.
  • The issue of constitutionality raised by the Court could lead to a revision of the current regulation.

Conclusions

The judgment no. 37796 of 2020 by the Court of Cassation raises crucial questions about the balance between the need to ensure public integrity and the respect for the fundamental rights of the convicted individuals. The issue of constitutional legitimacy concerning Article 317-bis of the Penal Code is an important step towards recognizing the necessity of a more humane and just sanctioning treatment, in line with the principles of proportionality and individualization set forth by our Constitution.