The ruling no. 16508 of 2024 by the Court of Appeals of Rome clarifies the role of mitigating factors in the disciplinary proceedings of notaries, with significant implications for the reduction of sanctions. Find out more.
The recent ruling no. 24874 of 2023 clarifies the admissibility of the appeal to the Supreme Court regarding bankruptcy ancillary penalties, highlighting the importance of the agreement between the parties in plea bargaining.
Let’s analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the application of ancillary penalties in the context of plea bargaining, in light of the legislative changes introduced in 2022.
Judgment No. 51557 of 2023 provides important clarifications on alternative penalties to short prison sentences, in light of the Cartabia reform, highlighting the rights of the convicted and the applicable procedures.
Judgment No. 48579 of 2023 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the applicability of alternative penalties for short custodial sentences, particularly in relation to the transitional provisions introduced by the Cartabia reform. We will analyze the legal and practical implications of this decision.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation highlights the evaluation criteria for the application of substitute penalties, emphasizing the importance of the offender's solvency and the judge's role in decisions regarding monetary sanctions.
Let’s analyze Ordinance No. 10773 of 2024 and the legal implications related to the delayed payment of the registration tax, highlighting the regulatory references and applicable sanctions.
Analysis of ruling no. 10298 of 2024, which clarifies the dynamics of liability between the taxpayer and the professional in the event of tax penalties, highlighting the non-punishability of the taxpayer if the non-payment is attributable to fraudulent behavior by a third party.
Analysis of ruling no. 17615 of 2023 regarding the abusive exercise of financial intermediation activities, with a focus on the implications of the regulatory reformulation.
Let's analyze ruling no. 39162 of 2024, which clarifies the criteria for the application of substitute sentences, highlighting the importance of the judge's prognostic reasoning.