Commentary on Judgment No. 2974 of 2025: Execution and Powers of the Judge

Judgment No. 2974 of January 7, 2025, by the Court of Appeal of Rome represents an important intervention in the field of criminal execution, particularly regarding the powers of the presiding judge. The Court annulled without referral a decree issued in an execution proceeding, emphasizing the limits of the orders that the presiding judge can adopt “de plano.” This article aims to analyze the key points of the judgment, providing a clear view of the legal implications.

The Powers of the Presiding Judge

According to the judgment in question, the presiding judge can make “de plano” decisions only in specific circumstances, as established by Article 666, paragraph 2, of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This means that he does not have the authority to decline jurisdiction for the handling of a case, ordering the transmission of the documents to another judicial authority. This limitation is fundamental to ensure legal certainty and the proper conduct of criminal proceedings.

The Summary of the Judgment

Orders that can be adopted “de plano” by the presiding judge - Indication - Decree by which jurisdiction is declined - Exclusion - Consequences. In matters of execution, the presiding judge can provide "de plano" only in the cases provided for by Art. 666, paragraph 2, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, so that any decree by which he has declined jurisdiction by ordering the transmission of documents to another judicial authority is null and void under Art. 178, paragraph 1, letter a), of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

This summary clearly highlights that every decision by the presiding judge must fall within the limits established by law. The nullity of the decree in question, pursuant to Art. 178, paragraph 1, letter a), of the Code of Criminal Procedure, underscores the importance of adhering to the procedures provided by law, thereby avoiding arbitrary decisions that could compromise the rights of the defendants.

Implications and Conclusions

Judgment No. 2974 of 2025, in addition to clarifying the powers of the presiding judge, provides insights into the principles of legality and respect for procedural guarantees. It is essential that every judicial operation complies with current regulations to ensure the proper functioning of justice. With this intervention, the Court aims to protect the rights of the defendants, strengthening confidence in the legal system.

Bianucci Law Firm