Welcome to our curated collection of articles and legal cases focusing on seizures in the context of law and jurisprudence. Dive into insightful analysis and court rulings on this important topic.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the criteria for preventive seizure aimed at extended confiscation, highlighting the importance of the consistency between illicit profits and the value of confiscable assets.
The recent ruling no. 25918 of 2024 clarifies the conditions for the automatic conversion of conservatory seizures into foreclosures, highlighting the importance of credit certainty on the part of the Administration.
Let us analyze the ruling no. 28502 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation, focused on the reviewability of preventive seizure orders and the assessment of the prerequisites for access to favorable tax regimes.
We explore the recent ruling no. 28709 of 2024 that clarifies the issue of preventive seizure in relation to tax offenses and the grounds for non-punishment provided by decree law no. 34 of 2023.
Let's explore ruling no. 28059 of 2024, which addresses the possibility of ordering preventive seizure even in the event of a declaration of incompetence by the judge, clarifying the requirements of urgency and the legal implications.
Analysis of the recent Order No. 18367 of 04/07/2024, which clarifies the autonomy of the grounds in opposition to enforcement and the implications for legal fees. Let’s explore the fundamental principles of this decision together.
Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 21119 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation regarding the administrative seizure of vehicles and the right to reimbursement of custody expenses, with particular attention to the ten-year statute of limitations.
Analysis of the recent ruling on the payment of the judicial administrator's fee in cases of preventive seizure, with a focus on regulatory and jurisprudential implications.
Order No. 17813 of 2024 clarifies the rights of third-party owners in the event of seizure and confiscation, highlighting the need for a preliminary step before the criminal judge to demonstrate good faith.
Ruling No. 25368 of 2023 clarifies the implications of violating custody obligations in the case of the seizure of registered movable assets, highlighting the deadline for filing a complaint and the responsibilities of the custodian.