Commentary on Judgment No. 2970 of 2024: The Assignment to the United Sections and Its Implications

In the recent judgment No. 2970 of December 17, 2024, the Court of Cassation addressed crucial issues regarding the assignment of appeals to the United Sections and the related procedures. This ruling is particularly significant for legal practitioners, as it provides insights into the legitimacy of the judging panels and the application of Articles 610 and 618 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The Assignment to the United Sections: A Prerogative of the First Presidency

According to the ruling, the assignment of an appeal to the United Sections is a prerogative of the First Presidency of the Court of Cassation, as provided by Article 610, paragraph 2, of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This provision establishes that only in cases of special importance, at the request of the Attorney General or the defense lawyers, can the appeal be referred to the United Sections.

In the specific case, the Court declared the request for referral inadmissible, highlighting that if the First Presidency does not identify the necessary conditions for assignment, the appeal is automatically assigned to an ordinary section. This aspect underscores the importance of a thorough evaluation by the First Presidency, which must consider the assessment criteria set forth in Article 618 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Critical Issues and Implications of the Judgment

Assignment of the First Presidency pursuant to Article 610, paragraph 2, of the Code of Criminal Procedure - Failure to exercise - Consequent designation of the competent ordinary section - Scheduling of the hearing before the panel - Request for referral to the United Sections - Legitimacy of the panel to decide - Existence - Assessment criteria. The assignment of the appeal to the United Sections at the request of the Attorney General, the defense lawyers, or ex officio, when the proposed issues are of special importance, is, according to Article 610, paragraph 2, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a prerogative of the First Presidency of the Court of Cassation, which, if it does not see the prerequisites, assigns the appeal to the individual section, so that, once the hearing date is set at the sectional level, the request made by the party to the First Presidency for the issue to be referred to the United Sections must be decided, according to the criteria of Article 618 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, by the assigned section and the relevant judging panel.

This ruling raises questions about the balance between the efficiency of the judicial system and the respect for procedures. In particular, the issue arises whether the discretion of the First Presidency may lead to excessive rigidity in the assignment of complex cases. The judgment, in fact, emphasizes that the request for referral must be evaluated by the assigned section, which implies a division of labor that could result in greater productivity but also in potential conflicts of interpretation.

Conclusions

In summary, judgment No. 2970 of 2024 represents an important reference point in the field of criminal procedure, highlighting the dynamics between the United Sections and the First Presidency of the Court of Cassation. The clarity of the rules and their correct application are fundamental to ensuring an efficient legal system that can respond to the demands of justice in a timely manner. It is essential for legal practitioners to understand the implications of such decisions to navigate the complex legal landscape effectively.

Bianucci Law Firm